Dec 28, 2025
Single, Ring, or Breaker-and-a-Half? Choosing the Right Bus Scheme
The arrangement of busbars and associated switching equipment in a substation environment is known as the bus scheme. Its design is critical to the various circuit and component connections within the system. Bus system design plays an equally critical role in a substation's operational flexibility, reliability, and maintenance requirements.
In modern substation design, we rely on three bus schemes: single, ring, and breaker-and-a-half bus. Each one needs to be considered in terms of the trade-off between cost and simplicity versus reliability and flexibility. Project requirements tend to dictate looking at each of the schemes separately.
Single Bus Scheme
The simplest of the three bus schemes is the single bus scheme. It connects all incoming and outgoing circuits to a single, common bus. Each circuit has its own breaker. The design is compact and easy to lay out. It also uses the fewest number of breakers and has the lowest footprint, capital costs, and operational needs.
Unfortunately, single-bus reliability isn't great. An entire substation can be taken down by a single failure or bus fault. Moreover, routine maintenance often requires a complete de-energization. The single bus scheme is reserved mainly for substations providing loads that can tolerate interruptions. These are typically less critical, lower-voltage substations.
Ring Bus Scheme
The primary characteristic of the ring bus scheme is that breakers are arranged in a closed loop. Each section between two breakers feeds a circuit. Every circuit is thereby connected through two series breakers around a ring. The result is a circuit with dual feeding paths. This is a circuit in which any single breaker can be removed for maintenance without interrupting power flow.
As you might imagine, the biggest downside of the ring bus scheme is complexity. It is more difficult to protect and control as design complexity increases. And in the event of a single breaker failure, additional circuits down the line can also be tripped.
Ring bus configurations are a safe bet for mission critical substations with higher voltage outputs. They are reliable but less costly than breaker-and-a-half configurations.
Breaker-and-a-Half Scheme
Two main buses typify the breaker-and-a-half scheme. Each one features three breakers and two circuits per bay. Each circuit also shares the middle breaker while maintaining exclusive use of the two end breakers. This results in each circuit essentially being connected by 1.5 breakers.
The two main advantages here are reliability and flexibility. For example, either bus can be taken out of service without issue. A single breaker can be maintained or a circuit expanded with more bays without placing any functional limits on the total number of circuits in the configuration.
On the downside, the breaker-and-a-half scheme is the most expensive of the three options. Designers also incur penalties in terms of total footprint and relay complexity. The design even demands more advanced protection and operating practices. Therefore, the scheme is typically reserved for highly critical nodes for which outages must be kept to a minimum.
Choosing the Right Scheme
Substation engineering is challenging even on its best days. There is so much that engineers need to consider even before drawing up the first set of plans. Among the considerations is the choice of bus schemes. Choosing the right scheme requires carefully analyzing capacity and output needs, land availability, maintenance capabilities, costs, in more.
Each of the three bus schemes has its advantages and disadvantages. All three are in play because each substation's scenario has its own unique requirements. At the end of the day, it boils down to the simple choice of which scheme is best suited to project needs.
Back to All Insights